Europe is Bigger Than You Think

Europe is Bigger Than You Think

Please note that some posts contain links that earn me a small commission to help keep the site running.

Most of you probably have limited vacation time. You have two, maybe three weeks, vacation time if you live in the US. So it’s understandable that you want to use that time wisely and pack in as much as possible when they travel to Europe. But Europe is bigger than you think. Here’s why you shouldn’t try to see it all in one trip.

Looking at the map

I found this fun website that lets you overlay different maps on top of each other. It didn’t have continents, but I was able to say that I wanted to put a map of the US over a map of Germany, and it shows the outline of the continental US over Europe. The site is here if you want to play with it, but below is a screenshot of what it looks like. (Note: It is not lined up as far as latitude. The long, straight border between the US and Canada would actually be just a bit north of Paris.)

Europe is bigger than you think

Distances between European highlights

If you wanted to hit the highlights of Europe, your list might look something like this: London, Paris, Barcelona, Rome, Munich, Vienna, Prague. The countries in Europe are a lot smaller than countries like the US or Canada, so it’s easy to look at a map and think it’s not too far to get from one city to the next. But here are the distances:

London to Paris: 280 miles
Paris to Barcelona: 645 miles
Barcelona to Rome: 840 miles
Rome to Munich: 575 miles
Munich to Vienna: 270 miles
Vienna to Prague: 205 miles

Europe is bigger than you think it is

For a little perspective, here is an itinerary in the US with similar distances:

Boston, MA to Philadelphia, PA: 310 miles
Philadelphia, PA to Charleston, SC: 670 miles
Charleston, SC to St. Louis, MO: 855 miles
St. Louis, MO to Atlanta, GA: 555 miles
Atlanta, GA to Tallahassee, FL: 260 miles
Tallahassee, FL to Pensacola, FL: 195 miles

Would you try to tackle a trip like that in two or even three weeks? Probably not. So you might not want to try to do it in Europe either.

Don’t forget transportation time

You’ll lose a lot of time in transit if you spend two weeks bouncing between five cities. Even if a two hour flight doesn’t seem like a lot of time, you’ll spend a lot more than just two hours in transit.

Remember that you have to be at the airport an hour or two ahead of your flight, and it takes time to get to the airport. Then you have to account for time once you land to find your luggage and get into the city. If you’re flying between a non-Schengen and a Schengen country, you’ll have to deal with passport checks, customs and immigration as well.

That two hour flight really takes about five hours minimum.

Trains are a good option for watching the scenery, but they will take a fair amount of time too. Rome to Munich is 9-10 hours. Paris to Barcelona is roughly the same. The quickest option I found for Munich to Barcelona is 14 hours.

Europe is bigger than you think

Stick to one country or neighboring countries

Italy covers an area of 116,347 square miles. Florida covers an area of 65,755 square miles. So Italy is almost twice the size of Florida. You could easily spend two or three weeks in Italy and only see a fraction of it.

Organize a two week itinerary of Germany and discover how varied a country it really is. Or go island hopping in Greece for a few weeks.

Interested in Amsterdam? There are several great cities in the Netherlands and neighboring Belgium to keep you entertained for a few weeks.

The countries in Europe are smaller than the US and Canada. But they’re still bigger than you think they are. The population of Europe (not including Russia) is almost twice the population of the US, so it’s more densely populated. There’s a lot more to see and experience in any one country than that one big city you’ve heard of.

Europe is bigger than you think it is. Take your time, slow down, and enjoy your trip instead of trying to see an entire continent in two weeks.

You might also enjoy:

Europe is Bigger Than You Think

Sign up to...

  • Get a copy of 11 Mistakes to Avoid on Your Next Vacation
  • Get regular emails with travel deals and tips
11 Mistakes to Avoid on Your Next Vacation
Please note that some posts contain links that earn me a small commission to help keep the site running. Read the affiliate disclosure here.


  1. Victoria

    Great points that I think should be considered on all trips, regardless of destination. I would much rather experience a smaller area than to simply see a large portion in a whirlwind. It is more conducive to living in the moment. Taking in the sights, smells, people and even the “feel” of a place that makes travel so rewarding.

    1. Author
      Ali Garland

      Thanks Victoria, I agree, definitely applies to any destination. Those whirlwind tours can be exhausting and you only get to see a tiny glimpse of the sights, instead of really getting to enjoy the personality of the location.

  2. Anne

    I went to three countries in Europe for a total of three months and even that wasn’t enough time to see them in depth. Even a lifetime probably wouldn’t be enough to really explore the continent in depth. I definitely would like to go back and see more of the continent.

    1. Author
      Ali Garland

      It’s almost like the opposite, right? The longer you’re in one place, the more you realize there is to see, do, learn, taste, experience… There’s never enough time!

  3. James

    Nice reality check for those that think they’ll be able to hopscotch from nation to nation … thanks for laying it out so well!

Leave a Comment